Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50. G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $363. SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16. Based on 33,195 user benchmarks for the Intel Core2 Duo E7400 and the Core2 Duo E8500, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,428 CPUs.
Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Core 2 Extreme X9100. T9100 @ 3.06 GHz - 35 Watts TDP. X9100 @ 3.06 GHz - 44 Watts TDP. Although performance is identical, the T9900 will run cooler than the X9100. However, due to compatibility issues, the X9100 or the T9900 may not work, so your fastest CPU upgrade choice may be the 2.6 GHz T9500.
65 Watt. 45 Watt. The Core i7-820QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E8400 in performance tests. Be aware that Core 2 Duo E8400 is a desktop processor while Core i7-820QM is a notebook one. Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8400 and Core i7-820QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28. Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64. G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $364. SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16. Based on 32,958 user benchmarks for the Intel Core2 Duo E7400 and the Pentium E5300, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,429 CPUs.
The charts in the table below demonstrate relative performance of Core 2 Duo E7500 and Pentium E5500 microprocessors in various kinds of programs. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. As a
The graphs below compare the most important Intel Pentium 4 3 GHz and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 characteristics. These features, as well as an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a processor performs. The "Number of cores / threads" graph shows the number of cores (darker area). Lighter area on the graph corresponds to the
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64. G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $364. SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16. Based on 34,505 user benchmarks for the Intel Core2 Duo E8500 and the Pentium G2020, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,429 CPUs.
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $354. SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16. Based on 30,588 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 5500U and the Intel Core2 Duo E7400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,431 CPUs.
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64. G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $364. SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16. Based on 56,621 user benchmarks for the Intel Core i3 530 and the Core2 Duo E7500, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,429 CPUs.
For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E7500" or "Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300" parts please click on the links in the table header. CPUIDs The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 microprocessors. Core 2 Duo E7300 2.66GHz; Core 2 Duo E7200 2.53GHz; Core 2 Duo E6850 3.0GHz; Core 2 Duo E6300 1.86GHz; Core 2 Duo E6420 2.13GHz; Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13GHz; Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz; Core 2 Duo E4500
\n \n\n core 2 duo e7500 vs core 2 duo e8400
65W. 65W. Lower is better. - Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400. Detailed side by side comparison of Intel E6600 vs E8400 specs can be found in the Specifications section below. More detailed comparison of internal features of both microprocessors is located in the CPUIDs section . Average CPU Mark. Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz. 1,368. Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz vs Intel Core2 Duo E8600. 1,196 (-12.6%) AMD Phenom II X3 720 vs Intel Core2 Duo E8600. 1,554 (+13.6%) Intel Core2 Duo E8200 @ 2.66GHz vs Intel Core2 Duo E8600. 1,107 (-19.1%)
\n \n\n\n\ncore 2 duo e7500 vs core 2 duo e8400
Below is a complete set of Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and Pentium G3250 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on ASRock Fatal1ty
0. 65W. 84W. Lower is better. - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 - Intel Pentium 4 630. Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Intel 630 specs can be found in the Specifications section below. More detailed comparison of internal features of both processors is located in the CPUIDs section . G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $364. SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16. Based on 43,017 user benchmarks for the Intel Core2 Duo E8500 and the Core2 Quad Q9400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,429 CPUs. G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $364. SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16. Based on 189,364 user benchmarks for the Intel Core i5-7500 and the Core2 Duo E7500, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,429 CPUs. Below is a complete set of Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and Core i7-870 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on ASUS P7P55D

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N4500. Around 45% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 72.4°C. A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm vs 45 nm. 10.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 65 Watt. Around 13% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1393 vs 1237.

.